• RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    This was them dividing the country between them for when the war was concluded. Unless we pretend we don’t know what this means

    In the event of a territorial and political rearrangement of the areas belonging to the Polish state,

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Neither country expected the treaty to last, and the areas in Poland were largely areas annexed from Ukraine and Lithuania beforehand. Is your point that the Soviets expected the Nazis to stay non-hostile until the end of World War II or even beyond it? Not only would that have been stupid, we have evidence to the contrary, that neither country expected the treaty to last.

      • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        You were arguing they weren’t planning on attacking and dividing Poland. That’s what my quote is in reply to.

          • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            What do you think the Secret Protocol and them spelling out where the actual border will be set was about

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 day ago

              I’ve already explained, it was a way for the Soviets to limit Nazi advances without breaking the pact. Neither country expected the pact to last very long, this wasn’t a coordinated plan to take over Europe but a way to stall the Nazi advance. Your point would require the Soviets to have genuinely wished to be allies of the Nazis, and to intend on doing so throughout all of World War II.

              • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                1 day ago

                It clearly delineates their spheres of influence and how they’ll divide Poland after the war. Damage control, opportunistic land grab, whatever side you fall on, I don’t think the fact of the agreement is in doubt (though there’s still a conspiracy theory about it)

                • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  It was an agreement for the Nazis to not press beyond certain boundaries, which is what prevented Poland from being entirely colonized by the genocidal Nazis, and the intent on the Soviet side was to stall the Nazis. There were no long-term plans for alliance.

                  • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    It was an agreement for the Nazis to not press beyond certain boundaries

                    And for Soviet Union to not press beyond a certain boundary. That’s how those divisions generally work.