• BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’d expect something around ~200 for n=9 and ~400 for n=10, but I imagine this is too big to be brute forced by raw computing

      • Klear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Wow, it already lists the xkcd in the links section. I have a feeling that snake is gonna bite its tail soon.

    • nialv7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Some trivial bounds: F(n-1) + 1 <= F(n) <= F(n-1) * 2 + 1.

      Also F(n) <= 2^(n-1)

    • four@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’d think that it’s not “too much to be brute forced”, but probably no one has thrown enough resources at that recently

      • BlackLaZoR@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        With each additional dimension, the amount of possible combinations grows exponentially. Without serious optimization efforts, computation requirements get prohibitive very, very fast