The dispute comes from Colorado — but it could have national implications for Trump and his political fate.

  • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    The Colorado supreme court said that Trump is not eligible to be president, which means he can’t be on the general ballot either.

    The SCOTUS agreed to hear an appeal. That means they will have to decide whether the Colorado ruling was correct or incorrect. Either way, they will determine whether Trump will appear on the general ballot in Colorado.

    • meshuggahn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      From what I can find the lower court rulings had 3 points of order:

      1: Whether trump engaged in inurection - CO says yes he did.

      2: Whether the insurrection clause applies to the office of the President- CO says it does.

      3: If 1 and 2 apply then Trump is ineligible to be on the primary ballot.

      The supreme Court is not obligated to comment on each point. They could come back and say ‘We are not ruling on points 1 and 2 but we will over turn point 3as an ineligible person is still allowed on a primary ballot since a primary doesn’t elect them president.’

      This would leave CO in a spot where they could still attempt to keep him off the general ballot but the appeal on 1 and 2 would still be unsettled.

      Am I missing something?

      • jballs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        Listening to the arguments, it sounds like they basically conceded point 1. There was some semantic arguing over point 2, but nothing serious.

        The real arguments were on point 3. I think that the court is going to find that states don’t have the ability to keep a candidate for a federal election off the ballot. If someone is elected to a federal office and is ineligible to hold said office, it will be up to Congress to do something. Basically, it sounds to me like they’re punting and then hoping they don’t have to address this again in November.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          So by overturning 3, he’s not allowed to be president unless he wins AND congress allows it by 2/3 vote?

          If congress doesn’t vote 2/3rd to allow it, then he becomes disqualified and Biden wins?

          • jballs@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            That’s what could be argued. So on January 6, 2025 when Congress meets to certify the election, they could refuse to if Trump won, because he’s not eligible. It would be the ultimate irony.