• Quicky@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Whether or not that’s the case, I think the proposed technical implementation above is a better way of enforcing the actual law than what’s been applied so far.

    • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Yeah I do too, but so would anyone who was seriously thinking about this in terms of keeping kids from looking at porn rather than restricting access to “adult content” (whatever that means) more broadly. Any programmer worth their salt would have immediately suggested “hey this is a bad idea we should do it this other way” when asked about the viability of the current solution and yet this was ignored.

      • ErmahgherdDavid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        My entire experience as a software engineer for the last 15 years has been being ignored by the non-exprerts in charge. It goes like this:

        MBA: I want to solve this problem using this solution

        Me: that won’t solve the problem well, how about-

        MBA: I don’t care for the laws of reality. Do it my way [or find another job]!

        They say they want our expertise but really they want validation of their own terrible ideas and they think coercing experts with threats of unemployment is as valuable as actually listening to those experts.

        This applies as much to the public sector and the absolute clowns we vote in to govern us as it does to the private sector where the clowns hold the purse strings. Frankly it makes me want to give up the subject I have a PhD in and grow potatoes on a remote island somewhere.