If I’m not mistaken the 240gb ssd + 500gb hd combination is a tiiiny little cheaper, which one y’all think is more worth it and why?

    • CameronDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think it’s an economies of scale thing, more people buy external drives than bare drives, so the price drives down? Does feel very wasteful though, I have a heap of e-waste drive cases :/

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Sometimes it’s because they use cheap Shingled Magnetic Recording (SMR) drives in the external enclosures. These drives are slower and less reliable than the Conventional Magnetic Recording (CMR) drives. Some of the cheaper internal drives are also SMR these days. An SMR drive is OK if you just want to write data to it and leave it there, and you’re not too worried about the transfer speeds. But if you’re doing a lot of intensive activity with many writes and rewrites, it’ll slow you down.

      • CameronDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        They are often Green drives as well. But the latest 10TB ones I bought and shucked a few days ago from WD are not SMR as far as I know? If you are careful with the disassembly and buy from a place with a good returns policy you can always return it if it’s SMR.