• boonhet@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    That helps, but largely the boards consist of major shareholders, or people that the shareholders have elected to be there.

    The board, representing the shareholders, needs to make sure the company maximizes shareholder value above all else. They steer the company in very broad strokes. But if the company does something illegal or highly unpopular, the board members want themselves, the shareholders and the company in general to be as insulated as possible. So the CEO is a sacrificial lamb who either resigns or is fired, and takes the golden parachute. The idea is that the CEO was at fault and everything’s gonna be better now (no it’s not lol)

    • Honytawk@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      And what kind of job do you think those shareholders do?

      They are CEOs of other companies.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Being a CEO and being a shareholder have nothing to do with each other.

        The truly rich, AKA the major shareholders, aren’t going to bother with a job, unless running their own company (probably the one they’re the major shareholder at).

        Then the big institutional shareholders (Blackrock and the like) invest other people’s money - people like you and me.

        Only a minority of shareholders for any given company, are CEOs at other companies.

        It’s still a club for the ultra rich and we ain’t in it. I’m just saying that your average CEO is set up to be a scapegoat for even richer and shadier people (while still very much not being one of us working class citizens)