StuartLemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Hofmaimaier@feddit.org to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 2 days ago

What could probably happen....

feddit.org

message-square
68
fedilink
864

What could probably happen....

feddit.org

Hofmaimaier@feddit.org to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 2 days ago
message-square
68
fedilink
  • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    36
    ·
    1 day ago

    people with good vision can probably see a single gold atom, I seem to remember that one useless fact about the smallest things we can see

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      A single atom of gold is far too small for any photon in the visible spectrum to interact with.

      A single atom of gold is 0.2 nanometres (a nanometre is an incredibly small thing and a gold atom isn’t even half of 1% of that), meanwhile the wavelength of blue light (The smallest wavelength of visible light) is a hulking 380 nanometres. No matter how much you zoom in you would never see anything a single atom is just too small to interact with light.

      • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        A single atom of gold is far too small for any photon in the visible spectrum to interact with.

        That’s incorrect — single atoms can, and do, interact with optical photons.

        https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.19671 https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms13716

        And the entire field of super resolution microscopy relies on small things (e.g., molecules) interacting with light.

    • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Sorry you’re getting down voted — lots of replies from folks unclear on what the diffraction limit means, atomic resonances, etc.: https://www.newscientist.com/article/2161094-a-single-atom-is-visible-to-the-naked-eye-in-this-stunning-photo/

      • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        this is what I was remembering!

        thank you

    • MTK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      20 hours ago

      You might mean a sheet of gold that is one atom thick, which would be visible and this would be true for most materials, but some are hard or impossible to produce.

      • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I’m trying to remember exactly but I think it was that if you can isolate a gold atom, you can bounce a laser on it and see the reflection with your eyes. Something about the reflection of gold and that being one of its interesting properties. Could be just my imagination though

    • Occultist0178@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not even close, a gold atom is about 140 pm, while the diffraction limit for optical microscopes is around 200 nm, so 1000 Times bigger. And this does not mean that you could see a 200 nm object, only that you can differentiate 2 objects that are at least 200 nm apart. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffraction-limited_system So no it is not possible to see atoms with visible light photons.

      • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Parent didn’t say resolve, they said see — you can’t resolve stars but you can most certainly see them.

        Light up a single atom enough and you can see it (unclear if this works with a dark adjusted naked eye or if a long exposure is required): https://www.newscientist.com/article/2161094-a-single-atom-is-visible-to-the-naked-eye-in-this-stunning-photo/

    • apex32@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 day ago

      Nope. Atoms are WAY too small to see, even with the most powerful optical microscopes.

      You may be thinking of a human egg cell, which can be seen with the naked eye.

      • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        No, they’re too small to resolve. You can see small things if they’re bright enough: https://www.newscientist.com/article/2161094-a-single-atom-is-visible-to-the-naked-eye-in-this-stunning-photo/

      • Flax@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        A chicken egg cell can also be seen with the naked eye

        • neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          21 hours ago

          What about a turkey egg?

          • Flax@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Ostrich egg

            • tempest@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              20 hours ago

              Vegreville egg

              • Jännät@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                19 hours ago

                Fabergé egg

    • veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      The width of human hair is the tiniest distance that people can notice

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      No shot.

      • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        https://www.newscientist.com/article/2161094-a-single-atom-is-visible-to-the-naked-eye-in-this-stunning-photo/

Comic Strips@lemmy.world

comicstrips@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

  • The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author’s website, for instance).
  • The comic must be a complete story.
  • If it is an external link, it must be to a specific story, not to the root of the site.
  • You may post comics from others or your own.
  • If you are posting a comic of your own, a maximum of one per week is allowed (I know, your comics are great, but this rule helps avoid spam).
  • The comic can be in any language, but if it’s not in English, OP must include an English translation in the post’s ‘body’ field (note: you don’t need to select a specific language when posting a comic).
  • Politeness.
  • Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.

Web of links

  • [email protected]: “I use Arch btw”
  • [email protected]: memes (you don’t say!)
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2.11K users / day
  • 5.29K users / week
  • 9.51K users / month
  • 21K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 18.1K subscribers
  • 2.28K Posts
  • 20.6K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • lawrence@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.9
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org