Tesla under investigation by California attorney general over Autopilot safety, marketing::The California attorney general is investigating Tesla over the electric car company’s driver assistance technology, CNBC has learned.

  • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Agreed. Anyone who claims FSD is worse driver than a human is just objectively wrong and doesn’t know what they’re talking about. Is it flawless? No. Is it better than the best human driver? Probably not. Is it miles ahead of average driver? Without a question.

    • stepintomydojo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Autopilot on freeways? Definitely better than the average driver. FSD on freeways? Same thing. I rely on those constantly, and also get frustrated when people complain about AP being unsafe.

      FSD on streets? Definitely still worse than the average driver, at least in places that don’t have perfectly laid out street grids and properly painted lane lines which is what I deal with. I can’t make it through a drive on streets without disengaging multiple times.

      The problem is these three different things get lumped together in conversations/articles all the time.

      • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah the article seems to use autopilot and FSD interchangeably but I was talking about FSD and I expect everyone else to mean it aswell who’s talking about autopilot because the autopilot feature in itself is nothing special.

        I’m basing my opinion on the videos I’ve seen from AI DRIVR on youtube who really seems to put it in challenging spots but yeah I don’t have any first hand experience myself so I can’t argue against that