This story seems to have faded in the wake of events ad nauseam. We are all aware of Senor Luigi. However, most folks can’t recall the full name of the guy that allegedly Luigi gunned down. Mission accomplished.
This story seems to have faded in the wake of events ad nauseam. We are all aware of Senor Luigi. However, most folks can’t recall the full name of the guy that allegedly Luigi gunned down. Mission accomplished.
That’s a fair point but it is the state’ job to prove their case to throw a jury and their dragging feet and doing fucky shit. After spending a month or two litigating the case in media.
They acted like it was a proven fact that he did it… They gonna need to convince the public now beyond chain of trust me bros
TBF there is a lot of evidence against him, such as his social media history, book reviews about how “protesting doesn’t work”, the murder weapon and bag full of $20k, complete lack of alibi, and his traveling in the opposite direction of the crime discreetly by hopping bus to bus.
That’s circumstantial
Also, the conviction starter pack backpack is likely tainted and or planted.
We don’t if has a alibi as of now
Finally, the state has to prove that he actually did the job.
Planted or otherwise the evidence against him is overwhelming.
You drinking too much koolaid that government was selling on fake news.
Since when people around here started trusting police and government lol
So to clarify your stance is that
A) The supposed evidence against him doesn’t exist, its fake news
and also
B) The evidence was clearly planted
There is no evidence that he was the person who shot the parasite.
Defense is challenging back pack because police didn’t follow the protocol. If they didn’t follow the protocol then there is no way to know if items in back were there when back was seized.