• FireRetardant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    20 hours ago

    There is also CAFE standards that made small, effecient vehicles require extremely high emissions standards while allowing looser standards for larger, less effecient vehicles. Effectively limiting foriegn market influence while increasing both the price and size of the average vehicle on American roads.

    • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      That’s not a competitive subsidy though. Anyone can and don take advantage of those emissions. The US does not have access to China subsidized materials or labor to compete in that market.

      BYD could build here and take advantage of that.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        The US actually heavily tariffs foreign-made vehicles that could skirt the CAFE requirements the way American trucks do. Light trucks suffer the Chicken Tax and can only be made in Canada, US or Mexico to bypass that. Been that way since the UAW boss asked LJB to do something about the German imports growing.

        • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          So build them here, like every other foreign auto maker.

          They accomplish two completely different effects by two completely different mechanisms. The former being available to every manufacturer.

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            So it’s not free market after all because the big 3 can make vehicles at home and sell abroad while the others have to make them in the US for the US market. In what way is it not a form of favoring the domestic auto companies?