• caseofthematts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Honestly, I’m not exactly sure what you mean by changed scenes. Do you have any examples? I’ve seen it 3 times and don’t really have any knowledge of this.

    Do you mean the flashbacks that are different based on who’s telling the story? Because those are clues in themselves.

    • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yes, some flashback scenes literally have multiple versions. E.g. the one where the old guy goes down the stairs, and his son tells him to go back up - it’s not just cut differently, the person going down the stairs is literally a different person.

      This is much worse from a classical “whodunnit” perspective. I’m not saying it’s bad! But Knives Out broke the genre conventions harder than Glass Onion did.

      • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Different versions of the same event in the past being shown is great. A detective will get different stories from different people. They don’t even have to lie, memory is not perfect.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Not according to the genre conventions. Hearing different versions? Sure. But seeing different versions means the audience can’t trust what they’re shown, and can’t figure out what’s happening based on their knowledge.

          Again, my whole point isn’t that this is bad, it’s simply that Glass Onion was more “honest” towards the viewer than Knives Out was.