Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 days agoStudy finds smartphone bans in Dutch schools improved focuswww.reuters.comexternal-linkmessage-square40fedilinkarrow-up1341arrow-down17cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1334arrow-down1external-linkStudy finds smartphone bans in Dutch schools improved focuswww.reuters.comDavriellelouna@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 days agomessage-square40fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareClusterBomb@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·12 hours agoYeah, except science does not work like that. 😐
minus-squareslackassassin@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·12 hours agoYes, it does. A subjective response can absolutely be an objective result.
minus-squareClusterBomb@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·4 hours agoThis is not a demonstration and this does not qualify as a scientific proof. 🤷 They polled teachers. It ir like I polled religious and conclude that God exists because God speaks to most of the people I polled. This is not science, sorry not sorry.
Yeah, except science does not work like that. 😐
Yes, it does. A subjective response can absolutely be an objective result.
This is not a demonstration and this does not qualify as a scientific proof. 🤷
They polled teachers. It ir like I polled religious and conclude that God exists because God speaks to most of the people I polled. This is not science, sorry not sorry.