• Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    So your issue isn’t that you don’t actually own the DVDs you paid for, but rather that you’re not allowed to run an unlicensed cinema.

    • Tattorack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I wonder what the “license” part of “unlicensed cinema” is. Could it… Could it just maybe have something to do with… Not actually owning the things you buy, and therefore requiring a license?

      • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Well, let’s use my photography as an example then. Do you think it’s perfectly okay if someone buys prints from me, sets up an art show displaying my pictures, and charges people money to see it - without my permission or offering me any compensation?

        • Tattorack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          You sold them your prints, didn’t you? They’re not allowed to claim any ownership over the art of your photography, but they still are owners of the print they bought.