I don’t think you can assume constant velocity. 16 forward movement lines on the top vs 13 on the bottom so it’s moving at 81.25% speed in the bottom compared to the top.
You can though, unless the water in the pool has no momentum. It would not be flat if the vehicle was accelerating enough to move that far in a 2-3 second dive.
I don’t think you can assume constant velocity. 16 forward movement lines on the top vs 13 on the bottom so it’s moving at 81.25% speed in the bottom compared to the top.
Pretty sure speed lines increase logarithmically with speed, not linearly.
Does this account for the presence of speed holes?
You don’t have to quote the entire reply for them to know what you’re responding to lmao
African or European style?
Wow. I am truly impressed.
You can though, unless the water in the pool has no momentum. It would not be flat if the vehicle was accelerating enough to move that far in a 2-3 second dive.
deleted by creator
This person engineers
deleted by creator