• Enkimaru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    15 hours ago

    It is definitely not constitutional protected free speech. Because constitution has nothing to say in this matter. On the other hand there is no law restricting such speech either. Making a law against it, that is valid under the constitution, would be tricky however.

    • aramova@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Making a law against it, that is valid under the constitution…

      The part that says…

      Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assem- ble, and to petition the Government for a re- dress of grievances.

      Make a law against the part that says not to make a law against it?

      I mean, it’s idiotic and on message for Trump.