It’s not a “new red line”. This is something that has already been tested in the courts because of a law written during WWII. It’s only allowed in very narrow circumstances.
For instance:
If someone serves in a foreign military/government and they still have citizenship and it can be proven that it was voluntary.
The same law that allowed for that also attempted to allow for denaturalization in cases where someone:
Deserted military service during wartime.
Voted in a foreign election.
But these were both found to be unconstitutional.
It’s not a “new red line”. This is something that has already been tested in the courts because of a law written during WWII. It’s only allowed in very narrow circumstances.
For instance:
If someone serves in a foreign military/government and they still have citizenship and it can be proven that it was voluntary.
The same law that allowed for that also attempted to allow for denaturalization in cases where someone:
But these were both found to be unconstitutional.
Legal Eagle talked about those cases here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VS-for7pUxU&t=980s
Dear Lord the amount of judges ignoring clearly written law to support slavery for war 🙄