Somehow both the most and least scary thing on the list…
That sounds an awful lot like restaurants and jobs…
The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence.
I know nothing about you or your situation, but food allergies can really mess up your life, and they’re often overlooked (speaking from experience).
It was Celiac for me… It’s such a relief to be able to make a change and do something about it instead of “just getting on with it.”
The helmet is often used by the illustrator to label characters. A helmet labeled “Cat” might be expected here. This is a subversion of that expectation by labeling the helmet “Helmet”.
Mental health care in Canada is almost at that point…
I think this is actually one of the most in-touch posts I’ve ever seen by a business. It was posted here, wasn’t it? They knew.
Yeah, and as someone lse mentioned: they often have a Libby service that gets you tonnes of free audiobooks and other digital materials.
I mean, you’re not wrong - but it’s a technique used every day for super-resolution microscopy.
There’s some surprisingly sci-fi stuff that’s possible with image deconvolution. Not exactly practical, but it is possible to recover some information from a blurry photo.
That’s exactly why I came to Lemmy: different trash.
Not everyone has a dedicated GPU, I would guess. GPUs are good at doing tensor calculations, but they’re not the only way.
Pretty sure it’s poured resin or the like…
I used to do drugs. I mean, I still do them, but I used to do them too.
I seem to be collecting vintage lenses. I stared by getting an adapter for my mirrorless camera and I just fell in love with the lovely character their ‘flaws’ give them.
Yes, I think if we can get an LLM to work while providing high quality, real world sources it will be a game changing technology across domains. As it stands though, it’s like believing a magician really does magic. The tricks they employ are incredibly useful in a magic show, but if you expect them to really cast a fireball in your defense, you’ll be sorely mistaken.
Did you read mine? If you wanted a depiction of a city, it’s more than good enough. In fact it’s amazing what it can do in that respect. My point is: it gets major details wrong in a way that feels right. That’s where the danger lies.
If your GPS consistently brought you to the wrong place, but you thought it was the right place, do you not think that might be a problem? No matter how many people found it useful, it could be dangerously wrong in some cases.
My worry is precisely because people find it so useful to “look things up”, paired with the fact that it has a tendency to wildly construct ‘information’ that feels true. It’s a real, serious problem that people need to understand when using it like that.
It’s like searching for a picture of Prague, seeing a drawing of Delhi, and then concluding you’ve been there. It’s not about laziness. It’s about accuracy.
ESH? Everyone’s a Shit Head?