• nulldev@lemmy.vepta.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    A significant number of subreddits shifting to private caused some expected stability issues, and we’ve been working on resolving the anticipated issue.

    How in the world does setting a bunch of subs to private crash the website?

    • withersailor@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s the user/moderator fault. If they would just keep working without pay there wouldn’t be any problem. /s

    • andrew@radiation.party
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      High-scale software is complex, sometimes there are edge cases where weird unexpected stuff happens. This isn’t a situation they would normally run into.

      • CycliCynic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It absolutely is something they would normally run into. I work on maintaining a massive application; think 60+ teams of 6, each extremely specialized and minimal overlap. Almost 75% of my job is predicting issues and avoiding them. Peer testing draws on this a ton as well. They just continue to plainly show that they don’t care. Time and time again, year after year, they continue to have the exact same issues and do fuck all about it.

        • LittlePrimate@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why would they normally run into 6000+ subs going private? I’m sure they tested that their code can generally handle some (usually smaller) subs going private, but the number and size of the subs going dark isn’t a normal scenario and I doubt anyone would have assumed such a successful and coordinated protest involving some of the biggest subs would even be possible a few months ago.

    • fireshaper@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Someone on Tilde posted that they used to work for Reddit and the way they have the front page set up to pull your subscribed subreddits and the ones that you might like to read from is spaghetti code and very brittle.

  • Generator@lemmy.pt
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just one thing, must be indefinitely not 48h, otherwise nothing will change. A year have 365 days, 48h it’s a weekend, if subreddits come back after 48h it’s nothing happened.

    • CleoTheWizard@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think that stating it as 48 hours was smart. Because if subreddits start saying it’s indefinite, then they have time to start replacing mods and shutting the protest down. Whereas here, 48 hours will pass. They lose a lot of money in just 2 days. And if nothing changes, you’ll likely see decreased quality and/or continued protest.

      I think it left room at the table for reddit to cooperate. It’s a common bargaining thing.

  • BioHall@lemmy.pt
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    How much spaghetti is your code if most of the communities switching to private fucks up your website?

  • FiskFisk33@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I saw a lot of people saying they used bots to rewrite their entire post history to things like “fuck /u/spez”

    I’m thinking that amount of comment editing might be quite the spike on the servers.

    • lawliot@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I did that, but not “fuck u/spez” because that might get the comment deleted altogether making the edit meaningless. Instead I edited to say the comments been deleted in protest against the API changes.