maris@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 day agoGambling with Lainlemmy.worldimagemessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up1288arrow-down111
arrow-up1277arrow-down1imageGambling with Lainlemmy.worldmaris@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 day agomessage-square30fedilink
minus-squarePtsf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·17 hours agoAre you sure? From what I can tell there’s a 5 in 6 chance of catastrophic failure.
minus-squareLucy :3@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up10·16 hours agoFirst of all, 1 in n. Second, 0…6 has amount 7 (len(0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) == 7), so therefore 1/7. Also,
minus-squarePtsf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·16 hours agoFair, I was trying to be cheeky and here you are shutting me up with a compiler level “nope”. Take your +1.
Are you sure? From what I can tell there’s a 5 in 6 chance of catastrophic failure.
First of all, 1 in n. Second, 0…6 has amount 7 (len(0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) == 7), so therefore 1/7.
Also,
Fair, I was trying to be cheeky and here you are shutting me up with a compiler level “nope”. Take your +1.