• suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    202
    arrow-down
    37
    ·
    3 days ago

    Maybe your wife’s choice of career has fuck all to do with how good of a person you are. Since she’s not property and you don’t control her, yeah?

    • HuntressHimbo@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      147
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      3 days ago

      Who is downvoting this? Melania is a monster, but doing nude modeling has 0 to do with it. Attacking Trump through that is really gross. He has plenty of gross skeletons to go for, and Melania has actually objectionable actions, this meme is trash.

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s not a judgement of Melania. It’s a judgment of the type of guy who would have a nude model mail order bride as their 3rd trophy wife.

      • Karjalan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        74
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah, shaming her for nude photos is pretty fucking weak and, imo, just detracts from any point you’re trying to make

            • Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              True. Pointing out a double standard has value, but they picked something imaginary instead of all the other criticisms that were directed at Obama and not Trump. Occupy Democrats has been consistently pretty crap tbh. Lots of twisted facts even if the spirit is in the right place.

          • Guidy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            3 days ago

            I’ll shame him for any god damned thing I please.

            You know who broadcast those news photos on national TV right after shitler won the last election? Putin.

            Shitler hasn’t ever been big on dignity, but a few decades ago neither political party would have allowed a candidate whose spouse had such photos to run.

            Yeah it’s a truly minor issue especially with how egregious everything else is these days, but it’s still a real and legitimate issue regardless of your feelings on sex work or equity or fairness.

            • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              You know who broadcast those news photos on national TV right after shitler won the last election? Putin.

              The billionaire war criminal who profited off the destruction of the USSR is also a misogynist, what’s your point?

              a few decades ago neither political party would have allowed a candidate whose spouse had such photos to run.

              And you understand that was/is due to their misogyny right?

            • suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Yeah it’s a truly minor issue especially with how egregious everything else is these days, but it’s still a real and legitimate issue regardless of your feelings on sex work or equity or fairness.

              • tomenzgg@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                My husband finally watched Billy Madison this year and I’ve been thrilled because I can finally reference this scene to my heart’s content and he’ll know what I’m taking about.

            • tiny_iota@endlesstalk.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              “no! when they go low we have to go high!” So high that we sail right over alleged high ground that we covet and allow morons to run the country!

              if we are mean we are just as bad as those meanies that are ruining the country! logic-ally speaking of course! but seriously trumps wife is a literal prostitute.

      • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        47
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Nude modeling is morally neutral.

        Hell, participating in ethically made hardcore porn is morally neutral.

        Judging a woman for either is misogynistic. Judging that woman’s partner for her choices is even more misogynistic.

        • jumjummy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          3 days ago

          Except if a wife sticks with her husband through his terrible choices., judging her is not misogynistic at all. Isn’t this the same crowd that loves to say if you’re sitting at a table with nazis, you’re no better than a nazi?

          • angrystego@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            That’s not what the meme is talking about. It shames her for nude photos, not for being a terrible person and sticking with her felon of a husband.

      • you_are_dust@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        My take is that it’s a rejection of the “high road” stance. That we have to be the better ones and don’t stoop to their level. Nothing is off limits when Trump is attacking people. The high ground hasn’t done anything positive. Besides that, people body shame Trump. His hair, his weight, his penis size. Call her a gold digging slut. There hasn’t been rules for years.

        • angrystego@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          So we should reject the “high road” and start being mysogynistic? Not a fan. I’ll gladly shame them with some choice words, but in ways that won’t make me feel like I’m turning nazi myself.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yes that’s how we beat the awful people who control the world!

          Nothing causes lasting and meaningful political change like going for the low hanging and bigoted fruits! Let’s all be misogynistic for equality!

          For the record, I don’t advocate that shitlib “high road” (AKA do nothing but argue procedure and deliver empty sound bites while fascists gradually stamp down every right and liberty owed to all people) either.

          Be vicious towards the fascists. But be specific about it. Tell them exactly why they’re loathsome and what sort of treatment they deserve.

          You don’t accomplish anything by slut shaming the awful wife of a misogynistic monster. It’s like mud wrestling with a pig.

        • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 days ago

          Funny that we can reject the high-road when it comes to misogynistic or body shaming in our messaging, but not, say, when it comes to needlessly restraining actual action with norms and procedures that Republicans can and do break at every convenience.

          • chillhelm@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            I’m reasonable certain that OP, the lemmy shit poster, is not in fact a member of Congress.

        • sobchak@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          If you successfully move people over with puritanical talking points, the party or whatever will get more puritanical. It also makes it easier for the other side to dismiss or counterattack if the other side is not puritanical. In this situation, it would be better to commend her “sex-positivity” or alternative lifestyle, relying on the other side’s dissapproval of such things, instead of framing it as “bad,” which kind of concedes that point.

        • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Yeah so we should all give in to the lowest common denominator and allow ourselves to be dragged backwards by idiots and fools who can’t make compelling arguments.

          Great advice /s

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        If you see this post and you come and comment defending Trump or harassing Obama then it’s a pretty safe bet you’re a piece of shit, downvote and move along.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Saying there is nothing wrong with the first lady of the united states posing naked for the entire world sure sounds like a defence of exactly 1 president ever recorded.

            • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              21 hours ago

              There is nothing wrong with ANY lady posing nude. It doesn’t matter who she is. Fuck you and your puritanical, misogynistic bullshit trying to assert that there is something inherently wrong with a woman allowing others to see her naked body.

        • SilentStorms@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          If you read that comment and interpret it as defending Trump and not defending women’s bodily autonomy, it’s a pretty safe bet that you’re a fucking moron.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            I think you missed the top level comment and replied to me instead. If not, you’re a hypocrite.

            • Tinidril@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Wut? It was very clearly not you I replied to. It’s not like you can’t look one comment up the thread lol.

    • ImWaitingForRetcons@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think it’s more about the evangelical base and their extreme cope than necessarily about Melania, though being hypocritical to attack your out group is nothing new.

      • Lemminary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yes, for me it’s the hypocrisy of the base. Imagine if Michelle or Hillary had been listed on that website Melania was on and had their pictures circulating. Imagine if those families had decorated the White House with some gaudy shit. Like Obama said, “imagine if I had done any of that”. The commenters are missing the point.

      • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s low-hanging fruit of the simple minded who can’t make a compelling argument. Don’t make excuses for misogyny just because the rhetoric is being used in your favor.