Amoxtli@thelemmy.club to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 days agoThe US government could get even more Intel stock if the company ends up losing control of its chip manufacturing businesswww.pcgamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square26linkfedilinkarrow-up1126arrow-down11
arrow-up1125arrow-down1external-linkThe US government could get even more Intel stock if the company ends up losing control of its chip manufacturing businesswww.pcgamer.comAmoxtli@thelemmy.club to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 days agomessage-square26linkfedilink
minus-squarehighball@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agohttps://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/what-s-new-for-generic-arm64-desktop-isos-in-25-10/66277 Maybe not that far.
minus-squareozymandias117@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agoThat doesn’t fix the problem of needing specific device tree files for every computer. So you still won’t be able to say, swap your WiFi chip in your laptop and still have it work. This just enables a small subset of (specifically Windows ARM laptops) to boot from an image. This is very different from x86, where ACPI allows you to have a single image that knows very little about the hardware. If ARM started using SystemReady, you could see a truly generic image, rather than having a specific list of laptops the “generic” image works with
https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/what-s-new-for-generic-arm64-desktop-isos-in-25-10/66277
Maybe not that far.
That doesn’t fix the problem of needing specific device tree files for every computer.
So you still won’t be able to say, swap your WiFi chip in your laptop and still have it work.
This just enables a small subset of (specifically Windows ARM laptops) to boot from an image.
This is very different from x86, where ACPI allows you to have a single image that knows very little about the hardware.
If ARM started using SystemReady, you could see a truly generic image, rather than having a specific list of laptops the “generic” image works with